Teich v. Arms
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.
This is an ordinary action for unlawful detainer. The complaint alleges the execution of a written lease for one year from August 1, 1904, for the monthly rental of $35, payable on the first of each month; that defendant entered into the occupation and possession of the premises; that on January 16, 1905, a demand in writing was made upon defendant to pay $175, the amount of rent unpaid, or surrender possession within three days; that defendant refused to do either, and the prayer is for the rent due and for damages. to the San Jose Safe Deposit Bank of Savings, and that thereupon said bank…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Jackson ex dem. Russell v. RowlandNew York Supreme Court · 1831
- Champion v. WoodsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Felton v. MillardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Mason v. WolffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
- Dreyfus v. HirtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- People v. GustafsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- United States v. 70.39 Acres of LandDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1958
- Houghton v. Kern Valley BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- Richmond v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
- Beach v. BoettcherAppellate Court of Illinois · 1944
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.