Legal Opinion

Richmond v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 19, 1908No. Civ. No. 567PublishedCited by 7 opinions

APPLICATION for writ. of certiorari to review an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, remanding a case certified to it from a justice’s court. Frederick W. Houser, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

Application for writ of certiorari to review order of superior court remanding to justice court a case of unlawful detainer which had been certified up by the justice court on the ground that title to real property was involved in the issues to be tried.

A former application was denied by this court because the proceeding was directed to the judge of the superior court instead of to the tribunal itself. It was not intended by the opinion then filed to determine anything but who were the proper parties to the proceeding, but in assuming the position of the petitioners for the purpose…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Phelan v. GardnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
  2. Johnson v. ChelyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
  3. Knowles v. MurphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Henderson v. AllenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863
  5. Menominee River Lumber Co. v. PhillbrookWisconsin Supreme Court · 1890

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Francis v. West Virginia Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Webb v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  3. Bekins v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
  4. American National Bank v. JohnsonAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1932
  5. White v. VeitchWyoming Supreme Court · 1921

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API