Legal Opinion

Nickell v. SOUTHVIEW HOMEOWNERS ASS'N

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided March 13, 2012No. 41128-8-IIPublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHunt, J.

¶1 Robert and Karen Nickell appeal the superior court’s grant of summary judgment to the South-view Homeowners Association and its ruling that the Nickells’ silence induced reliance by others and estopped the Nickells’ adverse possession of an 18-foot-wide strip of land between their property and Southview’s property. The Nickells argue that (1) by June 1995, they had acquired full title to the disputed strip by adverse possession; (2) the prescriptive easement “vacant lands doctrine” does not apply because their use of the disputed strip was permanent, not sporadic, and occurred on land…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Lybbert v. Grant CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  2. ATHERTON CONDO APARTMENT-OWNERS ASS'N BD OF DIRECTORS v. Blume Dev. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Hisle v. Todd Pacific Shipyards Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Hisle v. Todd Pacific Shipyards Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Chaplin v. SandersWashington Supreme Court · 1984

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Nicosia v. Amazon.com, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2019
  2. Darlington Ofuasia Et Al., Appellants, v. Dana William Smurr Et Al., RespondentsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017
  3. Shelcon Construction Group, LLC v. HaymondCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  4. Beres v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2019
  5. Bowdish Living Trust v. Karen K. DecarufelCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API