Legal Opinion

Commonwealth Ex Rel. Whitling v. Russell

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 2, 1962No. Appeal, 39PublishedCited by 115 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Benjamin R. Jones,

Upon this appeal a very narrow issue is presented: two defendants, with antagonistic defenses, having been called for trial and the trial court having appointed as counsel for one defendant an attorney previously retained to represent the other defendant, was the latter prejudiced by the conflict of interest created by such appointment? Basically, this question evaluates the right of a defendant, even in a non-capital case, to be represented, if at all, by counsel without conflicting interests.

Richard Whitling [appellant] and his brother, Ralph…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Jedwabny v. Philadelphia Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  2. Pile v. ThompsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
  3. Commonwealth ex rel. Whitling v. RussellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1961

3Cited by115 opinions

  1. Holloway v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. George T. C. Lollar v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
  3. Commonwealth v. BreakerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  4. Commonwealth v. WilsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  5. Commonwealth v. RogalSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015

110 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API