Commonwealth v. Breaker
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Me. Justice Roberts,
Since at least Powell v. Alabama, 287 U.S. 45, 53 S. Ct. 55 (1932), an essential element of the Sixth Amendment’s right to counsel has been the right to “effective assistance of counsel.” See Commonwealth ex rel. Washington v. Maroney, 427 Pa. 599, 235 A.2d 349 (1967). Inherent in the right to effective assistance of counsel is the correlative right to be represented by counsel unburdened by any conflict of interest, Glasser v. United States, 315 U.S. 60, 62 S. Ct. 457 (1942); Commonwealth ex rel. Whitling v. Russell, 406 Pa. 45, 176 A.2d 641 (1962). We hold that…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Washington v. MaroneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Whitling v. RussellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
- Commonwealth v. WilsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by72 opinions
- Commonwealth v. TedfordSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- Commonwealth v. SullivanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Pirillo v. PirilloSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Commonwealth v. RogalSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- Commonwealth v. WestbrookSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.