George T. C. Lollar v. United States
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
J. SKELLY WRIGHT, Circuit Judge:
Appellant and a co-defendant, Ford, were convicted of robbery and assault with a dangerous weapon.1 One attorney was appointed to represent both indigent defendants. Appellant now asserts that requiring him to share an attorney with his co-defendant deprived him of his constitutional right to effective assistance of counsel. We agree and hold that appellant is entitled to a new trial with the aid of his own attorney.
The Supreme Court long ago observed that “the ‘Assistance of Counsel’ guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment contemplates that such assistance be…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Coppedge v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Griffin v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by104 opinions
- Holloway v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- People v. DoolinCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
- People v. RundleCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
- People v. BerlandIllinois Supreme Court · 1979
- Ibn-Tamas v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
99 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.