Legal Opinion

Pile v. Thompson

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 1, 1916No. Appeal, No. 290PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal, No. 290, Oct. T., 1914, by defendant, from judgment of Municipal Court, Philadelphia Co.; May T., 1914, No. 100, on verdict for plaintiff in case of Frederick M. Pile v. Charles L. Thompson. ■ Assumpsit on a written agreement. Before BonniWELL, J. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Superior Court. Verdict and judgment for plaintiff for $154.50. Defendant appealed. Error assigned was in refusing binding instructions for defendant.

Read the full summary

Appeal, No. 290, Oct. T., 1914, by defendant, from judgment of Municipal Court, Philadelphia Co.; May T., 1914, No. 100, on verdict for plaintiff in case of Frederick M. Pile v. Charles L. Thompson. ■ Assumpsit on a written agreement. Before BonniWELL, J. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Superior Court. Verdict and judgment for plaintiff for $154.50. Defendant appealed. Error assigned was in refusing binding instructions for defendant. An attorney cannot make a profit out of his office*to the prejudice of the right and interest of his-client: Lockhart v. McKinley, 9 W. N. C. 11;…

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Orlady, P. J.,

We dispose of this case on the facts as presented by the appellee. He was the attorney of a building and loan association which held two mortgages against the appellant, and ón both of these there was a default for dues in arrears. At a January meeting of the directors, the attorney “was authorized to at once foreclose the mortgages unless O. L. Thompson, (the appellant), would sign an agreement empowering the solicitor to collect all the rents on the property during the life of the mortgages, and out of the rents to pay all dues and interest to the association, and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Everhart v. SearleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1872
  2. Johnson v. HulingsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1883
  3. Holt v. GreenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1873
  4. Ham v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1878
  5. O'Donnell v. BreckSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1898

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Whitling v. RussellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  2. Hazle Drug Co. v. WilnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  3. Commonwealth v. PinhasSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  4. Commonwealth ex rel. Lucas v. RussellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  5. Commonwealth ex rel. Whitling v. RussellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1961

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API