Legal Opinion

Overton & Co. v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided March 25, 1914No. 1115PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, G. A. 7447 (T. D. 33277).

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, Judge

Certain merchandise imported at the port of New York was returned by the appraiser as bagging for cotton and was assessed for duty by the collector of customs at six-tenths of 1 cent per square yard under the provisions of paragraph 355 of the tariff act of 1909, which said paragraph reads as follows:

355. Bagging for cotton, gunny cloth, and similar fabrics, suitable for covering cotton, composed of single yams made of jute, jute butts, or hemp, not bleached, dyed, *184colored, stained, painted, or printed, not exceeding 16 threads to the square inch, counting the warp and filling, and weighing…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Arthur's Executors v. ButterfieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. Latimer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  3. Swan v. ArthurSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  4. Patton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  5. United States v. BurneCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. American Express Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  2. Watson v. York Metal & Alloys Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
  3. Gehl Bros. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1940
  4. Charlotte Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1940
  5. J. A. Freeman & Son v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API