Legal Opinion
Rose v. State Bar
California Supreme Court
Decided October 5, 1989No. S004192PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
THE COURT.
The Review Department of the State Bar Court has recommended that petitioner Mason Harry Rose V be disbarred from the practice of law in California and that he be ordered to comply with the requirements of rule 955, California Rules of Court. Petitioner was admitted to the practice of law in California in January 1971 and has no record of prior discipline.
Disciplinary proceedings were initiated against petitioner in 1984 through issuance of three notices to show cause which were consolidated for hearing. An amended notice to show cause charging eight counts was issued in…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- In Re Marriage of CarneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Chefsky v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
- Alberton v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
- Colonial Life & Accident Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Beery v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- In Re SteeleCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- Ramirez v. Fuselier (In Re Ramirez)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- In Re Rose VCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
- Keilholtz v. Lennox Hearth Products Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2010
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. PotterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.