Legal Opinion
Southern Minnesota Municipal Power Agency v. Schrader
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided March 21, 1986No. C5-85-1356PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LANSING, Judge.
The employer, Southern Minnesota Municipal Power Agency (SMMPA), appeals from a judgment upholding the decision of a hearing board appointed under the Veterans Preference Act to reduce the sanction for Philip Schrader’s misconduct from dismissal to a 60-day unpaid suspension. The employer contends that after finding misconduct the hearing board had no authority to reduce the sanction. We agree and reverse.
FACTS
Philip Schrader began working at SMMPA as Director of Information in December 1980. Shortly thereafter Schrader was authorized to hire an information specialist,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Ekstedt v. Village of New HopeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
- Leininger v. City of BloomingtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Garavalia v. City of StillwaterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
- State Ex Rel. Caffrey v. Metropolitan Airports CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Mitlyng v. WolffSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Southern Minnesota Municipal Power Agency v. SchraderSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- City of Saint Paul v. EldredgeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
- In re LaFondCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- Southern Minnesota Municipal Power Agency v. SchraderSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986