Legal Opinion

Oliver-Finnie Company v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided June 8, 1960No. 473-53PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LARAMORE, Judge.

This action arises out of a contract between the plaintiff and the Army Quartermaster Corps, involving the assembly of combat rations (hereinafter referred to as C rations) for the Armed Forces during the Korean conflict. Plaintiff seeks damages under alternative theories of breach of contract, or termination of the original written contract giving rise to an implied contract. The defendant has counterclaimed for the value of certain Government-furnished components allegedly lost or damaged by the plaintiff during the performance of the contract in excess of contract…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Story Parchment Co. v. Paterson Parchment Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. F. H. McGraw & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1955
  3. Needles ex rel. Needles v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1944
  4. Torres v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1953
  5. Penker Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1942

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. J. D. Hedin Construction Company, Inc., for Its Own Use and for the Use of Fischbach & Moore, Its Sub-Contractor v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
  2. Helene Curtis Industries, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
  3. WRB Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
  4. James A. Boyajian, Assignee of Triumph Manufacturing Company, Bankrupt v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970
  5. Bruce Construction Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API