Legal Opinion

Bruce Construction Corporation v. The United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided November 15, 1963No. 479-60PublishedCited by 77 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DURFEE, Judge.

This case involves a claim for equitable adjustment for the alleged “additional value” of building block that was used in construction of buildings on the Air Force Base at Homestead, Florida.

The principal issue before us is whether plaintiffs have suffered damages as a result of defendant’s rejection of a building block and the consequent requirement that plaintiffs substitute a different block, where the price paid for the two different blocks was the same.

Plaintiffs entered into a contract, DA 08-123-ENG — 1595, with the Corps of Engineers on September 15, 1954. The contract…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. Callahan Walker Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. F. H. McGraw & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1955
  3. Oliver-Finnie Company v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1960
  4. McFerran v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1904

3Cited by77 opinions

  1. C. Sanchez and Son, Incorporated v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
  2. Mega Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
  3. James A. Boyajian, Assignee of Triumph Manufacturing Company, Bankrupt v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970
  4. Electronic and Missile Facilities, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1969
  5. Miller Elevator Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1994

72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API