Legal Opinion

Govin v. Hunter

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided September 14, 1962No. 3049PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McINTYRE

The only question presented on appeal in the instant case is whether or not sufficient evidence was offered in the trial below to go to the jury. The case involved a claim on the part of Lawney Estelle Govin and her husband, Jerry Francis Govin, for injury allegedly caused by Dr. Richard T. Hunter, a practicing physician, in a surgical operation performed upon the right leg of Mrs. Govin for correction of a varicose-vein condition and the stripping of a vein. At the close of all the testimony on behalf of both sides, the trial court, considering the evidexrce insufficient to support the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Ewing v. GoodeU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Ohio · 1897
  2. Natanson v. KlineSupreme Court of Kansas · 1960
  3. Di Filippo v. PrestonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1961
  4. Hunt v. BradshawSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  5. Stallcup v. CoscarartArizona Supreme Court · 1955

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Jerry W. Canterbury v. William Thornton Spence and the Washington Hospital Center, a Body CorporateCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
  2. Wilkinson v. VeseySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1972
  3. Wilson v. ScottTexas Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Logan v. Greenwich Hospital Ass'nSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  5. Fiorentino v. WengerNew York Court of Appeals · 1967

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API