Legal Opinion

Gile v. Widholm

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 29, 1962PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurrie, J.

Plaintiffs advance three contentions on this appeal:(1) That the evidence establishes as a matter of law that Mrs. Widholm violated the provision of a safety statute, sec. 346.31 (3) (c), in-making a left turn into Doty street;(2) That the trial court committed prejudicial error in its instructions to the jury; and(3) That a new trial should be granted in the interests of justice.

Alleged Violation of Safety Statute.

Sec. 346.31 (3) (c), Stats., requires a driver in making a left turn onto a one-way street to use “the lane next to the left-hand curb or edge of the roadway.” Plaintiffs argue…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Brice v. Milwaukee Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Scalzo v. MarshWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Minkel v. BibbeyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. MacK Trucks, Inc. v. SundeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Chapnitsky v. McCloneWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Willenkamp v. Keeshin Transport System, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Buel v. La Crosse Transit Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API