Gile v. Widholm
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCurrie, J.
Plaintiffs advance three contentions on this appeal:(1) That the evidence establishes as a matter of law that Mrs. Widholm violated the provision of a safety statute, sec. 346.31 (3) (c), in-making a left turn into Doty street;(2) That the trial court committed prejudicial error in its instructions to the jury; and(3) That a new trial should be granted in the interests of justice.
Alleged Violation of Safety Statute.
Sec. 346.31 (3) (c), Stats., requires a driver in making a left turn onto a one-way street to use “the lane next to the left-hand curb or edge of the roadway.” Plaintiffs argue…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Brice v. Milwaukee Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
- Scalzo v. MarshWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
- Minkel v. BibbeyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
3Cited by4 opinions
- MacK Trucks, Inc. v. SundeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
- Chapnitsky v. McCloneWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
- Willenkamp v. Keeshin Transport System, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
- Buel v. La Crosse Transit Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1977