Legal Opinion

Minkel v. Bibbey

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 3, 1953PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurrie, J.

The trial court set aside the jury’s finding that Mickelson was negligent as to lookout on the ground that there was not sufficient evidence to sustain such finding. No question inquiring as to whether Mickelson was negligent with respect to management and control was submitted to the jury and there was no request by plaintiff’s counsel that such a question be submitted in the verdict.

The facts in this case give rise to an almost irresistible inference that either Mickelson did not keep a proper lookout, or else he failed to so manage and control the car as to avoid colliding with the other…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hilker v. Western Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Nimits v. Motor Transport Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Fondow v. Milwaukee Electric Railway & Transport Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Clocherez v. MillerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1952

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. MacK Trucks, Inc. v. SundeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Giemza v. Allied American Mutual Fire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Gile v. WidholmWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API