Legal Opinion

Brice v. Milwaukee Automobile Insurance

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 1956PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurrie, J.

The defendants raise the following three issues on this appeal:(1) There is no credible evidence to support the jury’s finding of negligence as to lookout on the part of the defendant Beverly Reimer.(2) The negligence of the plaintiff Dorothy Brice was equal to or greater than the negligence of Beverly Reimer.(3) The trial court committed error in its instructions to the jury.

Miss Reimer testified that when she first saw the two little girls she was approximately 40 feet south of the south line of the intersection; that she took her foot off the accelerator but did not apply her brakes; and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Olson v. Milwaukee Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Taylor v. Western Casualty & Surety Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Sturm v. Simpson's Garment Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Hanson v. BinderWisconsin Supreme Court · 1952

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Cirillo v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Rixmann v. Somerset Public SchoolsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Wirsing v. KrzeminskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Moffitt v. CarrollSupreme Court of Delaware · 1994
  5. Blahnik v. DaxWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API