Legal Opinion

Simonini v. Passalacqua

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 28, 1986No. A018716PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ROUSE, J.

Intervener Roman Catholic Bishop of Santa Rosa appeals from the trial court’s order awarding a commission on the estate sale of certain real property to real party in interest, Key land Properties, Inc. (Key land). Intervener contends that the Probate Code 1 does not authorize such a commission. We agree and reverse.

The present controversy evolves out of a partition action involving the estates of two individuals who held a joint tenancy interest in a parcel of real property. Intervener was allowed to intervene in the action because, as sole distributee of defendant estate, he…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Estate of BaldwinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
  2. Kalina v. San Mateo Community College DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
  3. Estate of CattaliniCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  4. Estate of ToyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Murillo v. Fleetwood Enterprises, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Oden v. BOARD OF ADMINISTRATION OF PUBLIC EMPLOYEES'RETIREMENT SYSTEMCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  3. Brown v. West Covina ToyotaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  4. Melikian v. AQUILA, LTD.California Court of Appeal · 1998
  5. Estate of BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API