Simonini v. Passalacqua
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ROUSE, J.
Intervener Roman Catholic Bishop of Santa Rosa appeals from the trial court’s order awarding a commission on the estate sale of certain real property to real party in interest, Key land Properties, Inc. (Key land). Intervener contends that the Probate Code 1 does not authorize such a commission. We agree and reverse.
The present controversy evolves out of a partition action involving the estates of two individuals who held a joint tenancy interest in a parcel of real property. Intervener was allowed to intervene in the action because, as sole distributee of defendant estate, he…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Estate of BaldwinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- Kalina v. San Mateo Community College DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
- Estate of CattaliniCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- Estate of ToyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
3Cited by9 opinions
- Murillo v. Fleetwood Enterprises, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1998
- Oden v. BOARD OF ADMINISTRATION OF PUBLIC EMPLOYEES'RETIREMENT SYSTEMCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Brown v. West Covina ToyotaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Melikian v. AQUILA, LTD.California Court of Appeal · 1998
- Estate of BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.