Legal Opinion

Brown v. West Covina Toyota

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 17, 1994No. B083055PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

LILLIE, P. J.

— Plaintiffs (hereinafter referred to collectively as Brown) appeal from an order of the municipal court 1 denying their motion to strike $31,300 in attorney fees and $1,346 in costs claimed by defendant West Covina Toyota (hereinafter Toyota) in a memorandum of costs filed after a judgment on directed verdict in defendant’s favor. The issue on this appeal is whether the municipal court properly permitted Toyota to recover costs and attorney fees under Civil Code section 2983.4, part of the Rees-Levering Motor Vehicle Sales and Financing Act (Civ. Code, § 2981 et seq.).

Fact…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Krieger v. Nick Alexander Imports, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1991
  2. Kwan v. Mercedes-Benz of North America, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1994
  3. Walters v. WeedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Denning v. StateCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Hernandez v. Atlantic Finance Co. of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Murillo v. Fleetwood Enterprises, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Earley v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  3. Reveles v. Toyota by the BayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
  4. Davis v. Ford Motor Credit Co. LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  5. Bed, Bath & Beyond of La Jolla, Inc. v. La Jolla Village Square Venture PartnersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API