Melikian v. AQUILA, LTD.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GAUT, J.—
1. Introduction
These two separate but related appeals arise out of a partition action involving the sale of real property by a receiver. In the first appeal, defendant and appellant Aquila, Ltd., a California limited partnership (Aquila), one of the former owners of the subject real property, argues that the court should not have awarded the receiver, William A. Benneyan (Benneyan), both an hourly fee and a fee based on 4 percent of the purchase price of the property. In the second appeal, intervener and appellant Bartlett 1 contends that the court should have awarded part of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Crawford v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
- People v. Riverside UniversityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- Schreiber v. Ditch Road InvestorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- Simonini v. PassalacquaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Estate of BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- City of Chula Vista v. GutierrezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Hawaii Ventures, LLC v. Otaka, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2007
- Sullivan v. DorsaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Southern California Sunbelt Developers, Inc. v. Banyan Ltd. PartnershipCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
- Builders Bank v. Carbon Beach Partners CA2/2California Court of Appeal · 2016
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.