Legal Opinion
State v. Byrd
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided February 11, 2002No. 46997-5-IPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
39 P.3d 1010 (2002)
110 Wash.App. 259
STATE of Washington, Respondent,
v.
Michael BYRD, Appellant.
No. 46997-5-I.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1.
February 11, 2002.
Jason Brett Saunders, Seattle, for Appellant.
Daniel Jason Clark, Seattle, for Respondent.
GROSSE, J.
A vehicle stop, whether pretextual or not, and no matter how brief, is a "seizure" for purposes of constitutional analysis regarding the validity of the stop. This "seizure" applies to the driver as well as the passengers of the vehicle, who may both contest the validity of the vehicle stop. Furthermore, where a defendant, as…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- State v. LadsonWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. LadsonWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. KennedyWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. StroudWashington Supreme Court · 1986
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. PradoCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
- State v. PradoCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
- State v. RehnCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
- State v. OsmanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
- State v. OsmanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.