Legal Opinion

State v. Osman

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided December 22, 2008No. 60359-1-IPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchindler, C.J.

¶1 In courts of limited jurisdiction, all proceedings are electronically recorded. Under RALJ 5.4, a party is entitled to a new trial if “any significant or material portion” of the electronic record is lost or damaged. RALJ 5.4 expressly delegates to the court of limited jurisdiction the authority to determine whether the missing portion of an electronic trial record is significant or material and grounds for a new trial. RALJ 5.4 provides that the court’s decision is subject to review by the superior court. In this case, Abdinasir Osman filed a motion challenging the district court’s…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Coppedge v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. State Ex Rel. Carroll v. JunkerWashington Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Draper v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. State v. CamarilloWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  5. State v. KennedyWashington Supreme Court · 1986

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. McLeanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
  2. State v. OsmanWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  3. State v. OsmanWashington Supreme Court · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API