State v. Prado
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtGrosse, J.
¶1 Washington State’s requirement that automobile drivers remain within a single lane of travel “as nearly as practicable” does not impose strict liability.1 A vehicle crossing over a lane once for one second by two tire widths does not, without more, constitute a traffic violation justifying a stop by a police officer. We affirm the superior court’s RALJ decision.
FACTS
¶2 Benjamin Tonelli Prado was stopped in May 2004 as he exited Interstate 5 at James Street. A police officer observed Tonelli Prado’s car cross an eight-inch white line dividing the exit lane from the adjacent lane by…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. LarsonWashington Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. Cerny, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2000
- State v. GullettOhio Court of Appeals · 1992
- State v. LivingstonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
- State v. ByrdCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. McLeanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
- Joanna S. Robinson v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
- State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
- State Of Washington v. Artur TysyachukCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
- State of Washington v. Erica C. Magallon AlvarezCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.