Legal Opinion
State v. Rehn
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided May 29, 2003No. 21134-7-IIIPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, C.J.
Jake Rehn was convicted at a combined suppression and stipulated facts bench trial of possessing psilocin mushrooms found in a car in which he was a passenger. On appeal, Mr. Rehn argues the trial court erred in denying suppression of the physical evidence and his statements. We affirm.
FACTS
Mr. Rehn moved to suppress the drug evidence and his statements after being charged with a single count of possessing a controlled substance, psilocin. The trial court held a combined CrR 3.5/3.6 hearing and stipulated bench trial. The facts are drawn mainly from the undisputed findings of fact and the…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- California v. BehelerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Thompson v. KeohaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. GroganCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
- State v. RehnCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
- State Of Washington v. Carmen Rose LeeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
- State v. GroganCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008