Legal Opinion

Wood v. Curran

California Supreme Court

Decided July 25, 1893No. 14962PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtPaterson, J.

This is an action to quiet title to a lot of land in the city of San Francisco. John Agnew took possession of the property in 1868, and held the same until April 25, 1871, when he conveyed it to John Hogan, who entered into possession of the land and held it until his death, which occurred August 6, 1874. Hogan left surviving him the widow, Ellen, and four minor children. Letters of administration were issued to Ellen August 26, 1874. On October 3,1884, after due proceedings had, the lot was sold under an order of the probate court to the respondent, who received a deed from the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ex parte YaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
  2. In re Estate of MooreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Roman Catholic Archbishop v. ShipmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Building v. HardieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Wood v. BradyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lee v. SilvaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Latta v. Western Inv. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
  3. Oil Well Supply Co. v. CreminSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  4. Potrero Nuevo Land Co. v. All PersonsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
  5. Castle v. SchulmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API