Legal Opinion

Ex parte Yale

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1864PublishedCited by 34 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court, Rhodes, J.

Gregory Yale, the attorney for the appellants in the case of Lent v. Morrill et al., now pending in this Court, filed a motion in writing to submit the said case to the Court on the briefs on file, which motion is as follows :

“Lent v. Morrill et al.—Supreme Court, January Term, 1864.—Gregory Yale, an attorney of this Court, having been admitted as an attorney and counsellor of this Court since its organization under the Constitution of the State, and having taken the oath to support the Constitution of the United States and of the State of California, and otherwise…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. ColemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1854
  2. Cohen v. WrightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863
  3. In re the Oaths to be taken by Attorneys & CounsellorsNew York Supreme Court · 1823

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Brydonjack v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Danskin v. San Diego Unified School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  3. State ex rel. Clyatt v. HockerSupreme Court of Florida · 1897
  4. In Re Application of GalushaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  5. In Re Applicants for LicenseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1906

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API