Legal Opinion

Truckee-Carson Irrigation District v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided February 8, 1988No. 512-78PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

REGINALD W. GIBSON, Judge:

Truckee-Carson Irrigation District (TCID), a public corporation organized under the laws of the State of Nevada, brings this action, as the real party-in-interest,1 to recover damages from the United States for breach of an alleged implied-in-fact contract commonly referred to as the “Nine-Point Program.” The terms of said purported implied-in-fact contract were that the plaintiff would forego the use of water, diverted from the Truckee River through the Newlands Reclamation Project, for power production during the winter months in consideration of certain…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Soriano v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Gibbs v. BuckSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  5. Nevada v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Entines v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997
  2. Kawa v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
  3. Mark Smith Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1988
  4. OAO Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1989
  5. Eliel v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1989

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API