Legal Opinion
Acton v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided August 1, 1990No. 269-89CPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LYDON, Senior Judge:
This civilian pay case is before the court on the parties’ motions for summary judg*215ment, pursuant to RUSCC 56(c).1 The parties’ dispute centers on the proper statute of limitations to be applied when plaintiffs seek overtime pay relative to leave taken under the “leave with pay” provisions of Title 5 of the United States Code (U.S.C.). Plaintiffs, 685 in number, allege that a six-year statute of limitations should apply (28 U.S.C. § 2501), and defendant maintains that a two-year statute of limitations (29 U.S.C. § 255(a)) should apply.2
Overtime claims covered by the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Cooper v. Federal Reserve Bank of RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- The D.L. Auld Company v. Chroma Graphics Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Beebe v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
- Joseph Sternberger, Trustee in Bankruptcy for Spenco, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
- Lanehart v. HornerCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Alan A. Abreu v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- Armitage v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1990
- Abreu v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1991
- Mark Acton and 579 Other Named v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- Abreu v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.