Carlson v. Duluth Street Railway Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Taylor, C.
On November 10,1928, a head-on collision occurred between plaintiff’s automobile driven by himself and a street car of defendant on Tower avenue in Superior, Wisconsin. Plaintiff recovered a verdict for damages. Defendant made- a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, and, in the event that it should be denied, made a motion for a new trial. The motion for judgment was denied. The motion for a new trial was granted unless plaintiff filed a written consent to reduce the verdict to the sum of $8,800, in which event the motion for a new trial was denied. Plaintiff filed the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Wherry v. Duluth, Missabe & Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
- Westcott v. Chicago Great Western RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
- Jones v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
- Sikorski v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- Anderson v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Farden v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
- Geers v. Des Moines Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1949