Legal Opinion
Clapp v. Kramer
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 18, 1958No. Civ. 5847PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, J.
The question here presented is the propriety of an order denying defendant’s motion for change of venue on the grounds of nonresidence of defendant and claimed inconvenience of defendant’s witnesses.
Plaintiff’s complaint sets forth two causes of action. The first is upon a contract arising out of an unpaid personal check of defendant for $1,703, where payment was stopped. The complaint alleges the check was made and executed by defendant at El Centro and was drawn on the California Bank, Beverly Hills Branch. The second cause of action is one of indebitatus assumpsit for goods, wares and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ward Manufacturing Co. v. MileyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Lakeside Ditch Co. v. Packwood Canal Co.California Court of Appeal · 1920
- Di Giorgio Fruit Corp. v. ZacharyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Schreiber v. HookerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Carnation Co. v. El Rey Cheese Co.California Court of Appeal · 1948
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- City of Los Angeles v. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co.California Court of Appeal · 1958
- O'BRIEN v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Talman v. TalmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Archer v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Pacific National Bank v. Covington Investment Co.California Court of Appeal · 1959
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.