Legal Opinion

Pacific National Bank v. Covington Investment Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 27, 1959No. Civ. 18166PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBray, P. J.

Defendants appeal from an order denying their motion for change of venue from San Francisco to Los Angeles.

Question Presented

Sufficiency of evidence to support court’s finding that the contract was entered into in San Francisco.

Recokd

Plaintiff’s complaint alleged that its principal place of business is in San Francisco; that in consideration of making loans to Pacific Ports Industries, Inc., defendant Covington Investment Company executed a guaranty in plaintiff’s favor, and in consideration of plaintiff’s acceptance of Covington’s guaranty the individual defendants executed to plaintiff a…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Hale v. BohannonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Carr v. HowellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Ward Manufacturing Co. v. MileyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  4. Dawson v. GoffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Kelly v. WoolseyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Skaggs-Stone, Inc. v. LaBattCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  2. Garrett v. Superior Court of Kings Cty.California Court of Appeal · 1967
  3. Meyer v. Burdett Oxygen Co.California Court of Appeal · 1959
  4. Hollopeter v. RogersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API