Legal Opinion
Detra Pollard v. William Halter, Commissioner of Social Security
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided July 23, 2004No. 03-6007PublishedCited by 524 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
POOLER, Circuit Judge.
On July 30, 2001, Detra Pollard, on behalf of her son David Pearson, pro se, brought this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for judicial review of the decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (“SSA” or “Commissioner”), dated September 20, 2000, finding David ineligible for Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”) benefits under Title XVI of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 1381-1383Í. She claims that the Commissioner erred in denying disability benefits to David by failing to consider new evidence regarding the severity of David’s attention…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Shalala v. SchaeferSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Patricia MacHadio v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by524 opinions
- Kohler v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
- Rolon v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- Johnson v. AstrueDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2008
- Hilsdorf v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2010
- Norman v. AstrueDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
519 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.