Legal Opinion
Johnson v. Astrue
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 26, 2008No. 07 Civ. 2839(GWG)PublishedCited by 154 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
GABRIEL W. GORENSTEIN, United States Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff Rosalie Johnson brings this action pro se on behalf of her grandson, Theorian Johnson, to review the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (the “Commissioner”) finding that Theo-rian is ineligible for Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”). The Commissioner has moved for judgment on the pleadings and dismissal pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(c). The parties have consented to this matter being determined by a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). For the reasons stated below, the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Albert Shaw v. Shirley S. Chater, as Commissioner of the Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- Maria TEJADA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Kenneth S. APFEL, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Detra Pollard v. William Halter, Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by154 opinions
- Rivera v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2019
- Conetta v. BerryhillDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2019
- Perozzi v. BerryhillDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
- Bonilla-Bukhari v. BerryhillDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2019
- Distefano v. BerryhillDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2019
149 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.