Legal Opinion
Acevedo v. Surles
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided November 18, 1991No. 89 Civ. 6257 (RJW)PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROBERT J. WARD, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Louis 0. Acevedo, III and Karen Nunnery have moved, pursuant to Rule 56, Fed.R.Civ.P., for summary judgment in the above-captioned action. Defendant Richard C. Surles, Ph.D., has cross-moved for summary judgment. For the reasons that follow, plaintiffs’ motion is granted and defendant’s motion is denied.
BACKGROUND
The instant cross-motions for summary judgment are made upon a set of stipulated facts. Those facts which are relevant to the legal questions involved are as follows: Plaintiff Acevedo
Acevedo is an indigent individual who resides at…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Daniels v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Brown v. StoneDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1999
- Cornett v. SheldonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1995
- Mental Disability Law Clinic, Touro Law Center v. HoganCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
- Colondres v. ScoppettaDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2003
- Langevin v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.