Legal Opinion
Wafra Leasing Corp. 1999-A-1 v. Prime Capital Corp.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided November 26, 2002No. 01 C 4314PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ST. EVE, District Judge.
Defendant KPMG has moved to dismiss counts eight and eleven of the Second Amended Complaint. Defendants Smith-burg and Walter have moved to dismiss count ten of the Second Amended Complaint. For the reasons set forth below, Defendant KPMG’s motion is granted in part and denied in part, and Defendants Smithburg and Walter’s motion is denied.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
A. General Background
Plaintiff Wafra Leasing Corporation 1999-A-l is a Cayman Islands corporation that was formed for the purpose of holding securities investments issued by Defendants.…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Lampf, Pleva, Lipkind, Prupis & Petigrow v. GilbertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,228 Rocco Dileo and Louise Dileo v. Ernst & YoungCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- Emil J. Bartholet v. Reishauer A.G. (Zurich) and Reishauer Corporation (Elgin)Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- Ellis Henderson v. Michael F. Sheahan and J.W. FairmanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- JOHNAON v. Tellabs, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2003
- In Re Spiegel, Inc. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2004
- Davis v. SPSS, INC.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2005
- 766347 Ontario Ltd. v. ZURICH CAPITAL MARKETS INC.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2003
- Fink v. Time Warner CableDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.