Legal Opinion
766347 Ontario Ltd. v. ZURICH CAPITAL MARKETS INC.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided January 23, 2003No. 02 C 3223PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ST. EVE, District Judge.
Defendants have moved to dismiss Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. For the reasons set forth below, Defendants’ motion is granted in part and denied in part.
BACKGROUND
This is an action arising out of Plaintiffs’ purchase of various interests in a limited partnership called Asset Allocation. Plaintiffs lost the majority of their investments in Asset Allocation and now seek to recover them. Plaintiffs allege in essence that they were defrauded by Asset Allocation, its general…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,228 Rocco Dileo and Louise Dileo v. Ernst & YoungCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- Emil J. Bartholet v. Reishauer A.G. (Zurich) and Reishauer Corporation (Elgin)Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- Ellis Henderson v. Michael F. Sheahan and J.W. FairmanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- W. Kenneth Tregenza, James E. Haas, and Erwin B. Seegers v. Great American Communications Company and Shearson Lehman Brothers, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- Cenco Inc. v. Seidman & SeidmanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- In Re Natural Gas Commodity LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2004
- Zurich Capital Markets Inc. v. CoglianeseDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2004
- Zurich Capital Markets, Inc. v. CoglianeseDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2004
- DH2, Inc. v. AthanassiadesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2005
- DH2, Inc. v. AthanassiadesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2005
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.