Shanbaum v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MEROW, Judge:
This case comes before the court on motions for summary judgment filed by the parties.1 The facts are not in dispute. The issue presented is whether a Federal Communications Commission (FCC) order resulted in a “taking” under the fifth amendment of the Constitution. For the reasons given below, it is concluded that no taking has been established and defendant’s motion for summary judgment is granted.
JURISDICTION
Under 28 U.S.C. § 1491, the Claims Court has jurisdiction over claims against the United States “founded * * * upon the Constitution * * * or any regulation of an…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Regional Rail Reorganization Act CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Eastport Steamship Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
- Federal Communications Commission v. Sanders Bros. Radio StationSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- South Puerto Rico Sugar Company Trading Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1964
- Americo Mosca v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1969
3Cited by18 opinions
- LaChance v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1988
- Shaw v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1985
- Noel v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1989
- Kelley v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1989
- Montego Bay Imports, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1986
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.