Legal Opinion

Shanbaum v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided December 22, 1982No. 352-82CPublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MEROW, Judge:

This case comes before the court on motions for summary judgment filed by the parties.1 The facts are not in dispute. The issue presented is whether a Federal Communications Commission (FCC) order resulted in a “taking” under the fifth amendment of the Constitution. For the reasons given below, it is concluded that no taking has been established and defendant’s motion for summary judgment is granted.

JURISDICTION

Under 28 U.S.C. § 1491, the Claims Court has jurisdiction over claims against the United States “founded * * * upon the Constitution * * * or any regulation of an…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Regional Rail Reorganization Act CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Eastport Steamship Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
  3. Federal Communications Commission v. Sanders Bros. Radio StationSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  4. South Puerto Rico Sugar Company Trading Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1964
  5. Americo Mosca v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1969

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. LaChance v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1988
  2. Shaw v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1985
  3. Noel v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1989
  4. Kelley v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1989
  5. Montego Bay Imports, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1986

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API