Legal Opinion

Americo Mosca v. The United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided November 14, 1969No. 227-68PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COWEN, Chief Judge:

Plaintiff, who appears pro se, has been granted a United States patent for a chemical fungicide known as Aluminum Ions Fungicide (Cuneo Mixture) which has not yet been made, used, sold or distributed within the United States. Plaintif has applied to the United States Depártment of Agriculture for the registration of his product in order to commercially market the Cuneo Mixture throughout the United States. The application has been denied and plaintiff asserts that his denial was wrongful, unconstitutional and has voided his patent and deprived him of substantial business…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. CausbySupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Eastport Steamship Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
  3. Goldblatt v. Town of HempsteadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. United Shoe MacHinery Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  5. United States v. Central Eureka Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Minehan v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
  3. Carruth v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1980
  4. United States v. Cepeda PenesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1978
  5. Shanghai Power Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1983

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API