Legal Opinion

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Clinton

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 31, 1974PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTongue, J.

This is an action by an insurance company to recover $837.48 paid, by it to reimburse defendant for medical expenses under the- terms of an automobile accident insurance policy issued by it to defendant, following an automobile, accident in which defendant was injured.

Defendant filed an action' to recover for the injuries sustained by him, including the medical expenses incurred as a result of that accident. That ■action was settled for $16,500.'

*655By the terms of the insurance policy, plaintiff insurance company was subrogated to defendant’s claim and to the amounts recovered as a result of…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. United Services Automobile Association v. HillsNebraska Supreme Court · 1961
  2. John Wanamaker, New York, Inc. v. Otis Elevator Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1920
  3. Wemme v. First Church of ChristOregon Supreme Court · 1924
  4. National Union Fire Insurance Company v. GrimesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
  5. Re Faling EstateOregon Supreme Court · 1924

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. U.S. Airways, Inc. v. McCutchenSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  2. Shadbolt v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Allstate Insurance Co. v. IvieUtah Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Barreca v. CobbSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1996
  5. Strawn v. Farmers InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 2013

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API