Legal Opinion

Doe v. Visionaire Corp.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 7, 2000No. ED 76584PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIAM H. CRANDALL, Jr., Judge.

Plaintiffs, John Doe and Jane Doe, filed a petition using pseudonyms and appeal from the trial court’s dismissal without prejudice. We dismiss the appeal.

Plaintiffs filed a motion for leave to file their petition under pseudonyms. Plaintiffs argued that if their names were made public then they and others not parties to the action would be subjected to “further emotional pain, embarrassment and humiliation.” The trial court granted the motion. Using pseudonyms, plaintiffs filed a three count petition for invasion of privacy, negligent infliction of emotional…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Mahoney v. Doerhoff Surgical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1991
  2. Chromalloy American Corp. v. Elyria Foundry Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1997
  3. Shores v. Express Lending Services, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1999
  4. Nicholson v. NicholsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. Adams v. InmanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. State v. SmothersMissouri Court of Appeals · 2009
  2. Kinder v. HoldenMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. Summer Chase Second Addition Subdivision Homeowners Ass'n v. Taylor-Morley, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. Walters Bender Strohbehn & Vaughan, P.C. v. MasonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
  5. Cramer v. SmootMissouri Court of Appeals · 2009

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API