Legal Opinion

State v. Smothers

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided November 17, 2009No. WD 70361PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAREN KING MITCHELL, Judge.

Respondent, Robert Smothers (Smothers), was charged with one count of forgery and one count of possession of a forging instrumentality. The circuit court found that the evidence contained in the State’s information and probable cause statement did not meet the statutory requirements of forgery as a matter of law. Accordingly, the circuit court granted Smothers’s motion to dismiss. Because we find that the State’s allegations, if proved, could meet the statutory elements of forgery, we reverse.

I. Facts and Procedural Background

Smothers was subject to a valid,…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Hasemeier v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1962
  2. State v. BurnsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1999
  3. Nicholson v. NicholsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. Doe v. Visionaire Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2000
  5. State v. RousseauMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. State v. DavisSupreme Court of Missouri · 2011
  2. State v. RodgersMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
  3. State of Missouri v. Robert MetzingerMissouri Court of Appeals · 2015
  4. State v. Diaz-ReyMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
  5. City of Columbia v. HendersonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API