Legal Opinion

Cramer v. Smoot

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided July 8, 2009No. SD 29443PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARY W. LYNCH, Chief Judge.

Harold J. Cramer appeals the trial court’s judgment dismissing his amended petition pursuant to Rule 55.27(a)(6), 1 for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Cramer asserts that his amended petition stated claims against Charles Smoot and Rhonda Rice for “money had and received.” Finding that the trial court’s judgment does not constitute a final judgment for purposes of appeal, this Court dismisses the appeal.

Factual and Procedural Background

The facts are taken from Cramer’s amended petition, with all reasonable inferences liberally construed…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Mahoney v. Doerhoff Surgical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1991
  2. Chromalloy American Corp. v. Elyria Foundry Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1997
  3. Lynch v. LynchSupreme Court of Missouri · 2008
  4. Baker v. City of Kansas CityMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Carden v. Missouri Intergovernmental Risk Management Ass'nMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Wanda Mayes v. Saint Luke's Hospital of Kansas City, (Consolidated with)Wanda Mayes v. Saint Luke's Hospital of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 2014
  2. State v. SmothersMissouri Court of Appeals · 2009
  3. Carleton Properties, LLC v. PattersonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
  4. Laronda Phox v. JoAnn C. BoesMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016
  5. Palisades Collection, LLC v. WatsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2012

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API