Legal Opinion
Furst & Thomas v. Elliott
Idaho Supreme Court
Decided March 18, 1936No. 6255PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGivens, C. J.
February 11, 1931, Mearl M. Cortner entered into the following contract with respondent to act as dealer of its products in the vicinity of Oroville, California, and to guarantee his payments for goods sold him on credit the appended guarantee contract was executed by his mother:
“SALES AGREEMENT.
“This agreement made and entered into at Freeport, Illinois, by and between Frank E. Furst and Fred G. Thomas, co-partners, doing business under the name of FURST & THOMAS of Freeport, Illinois, and Mearl M. Cortner of Oroville, California hereinafter called the Dealer witnesseth :
“That, whereas the…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Phelps v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Pollitz v. WickershamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- McGrath v. CarrollCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Payne v. NeuvalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Village of Sand Point v. DoyleIdaho Supreme Court · 1905
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Mignot v. ParkhillOregon Supreme Court · 1964
- Eastern Idaho Loan & Trust Co. v. BlombergIdaho Supreme Court · 1941
- Bank of Silvis v. Boultinghouse Auction Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1979
- Aker v. ColemanIdaho Supreme Court · 1939
- Carlson v. Estate of CarlsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1969
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.