Legal Opinion · Concurrence

State v. DOMINGUEZ-CORONADO

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 23, 2008No. CC 04C50555; CA A128779; SC S056256; CC 99122871; CA A116966; SC S055025; CC C040170CR; CA A128644; CC C0402446CR; CA A128645; SC S055324PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1ConcurrenceGillette, J.

The court today denies petitions for review in three cases, State v. Dominguez-Coronado, 219 Or App 315, 182 P3d 322 (2008), State v. Holcomb, order of the presiding judge denying petition for reconsideration dated May 21,2008, and State v. Watts, order of the presiding judge denying petition for reconsideration dated April 23, 2008. I concur in those decisions, but write separately to call to the attention of the Court of Appeals a concern that that court may be misinterpreting the scope of its authority to reconsider its decisions.

Each of these three cases involved a criminal defendant’s…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. BirchfieldOregon Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Kentner v. Gulf InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  3. State v. Dominguez-CoronadoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. McMillinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API