State v. Callahan
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Per curiam
Defendant was convicted of eight counts of sexual abuse in the first degree. ORS 163.427. The trial court imposed consecutive sentences based on its own findings of fact under ORS 137.123(2). Defendant appealed. His single assignment of error was that the trial court should not have admitted certain evidence that his computer had been used to conduct searches for pornography depicting young women who appeared to be between the ages of 12 and 18. We affirmed without opinion. State v. Callahan, 213 Or App 587, 162 P3d 1095, rev den, 343 Or 366 (2007). Following that, the Supreme Court issued…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. IceOregon Supreme Court · 2007
- Michael v. CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICESSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- State v. Dominguez-CoronadoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
- State v. CallahanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. WestbrookCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008