Legal Opinion

Lockleair v. Martin

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 11, 1957No. 469PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHiggiNS, J.

Both parties concede the respondent, Ebby Martin, is entitled to have allotted to him 100 acres of the described land on the west end of the tract and that the petitioner is entitled to the remainder. Both parties concede the proper way to divide the tract is to run a north-south line at such location as will cut off 100 acres on the west which shall be the property of the respondent, and the remainder of the tract on the east shall be the property of the petitioner.

What appears to have been a rather simple legal problem of locating the true dividing line between the adjoining landowners has…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Steelman v. . BenfieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  2. Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. GreenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  3. Cannon v. City of WilmingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  4. Gregory v. . PinnixSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
  5. Murphy v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Skipper v. YowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
  2. Quality Inns International, Inc. v. Booth, Fish, Simpson, Harrison & HallCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  3. Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
  4. LDDC, INC. v. PressleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  5. Boyd v. WattsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API