Legal Opinion

Boyd v. Watts

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 19, 1985No. 8419DC718PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WELLS, Judge.

Neither side challenges the validity of the contract; despite reservations, we therefore express no opinion thereon. See J. Narron, Installment Land Contracts in North Carolina, 3 Camp. L. Rev. 29 (1981). Nothing in the contract prevented Dayvault or the Mills from transferring their legal title to the property, and no irregularities are alleged or apparent in the title transfers. It is clear then that plaintiffs became the owners of the legal title to the property. The only questions presented therefore involved directed verdict on the contract claims. They are: (1) were…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Wells v. ClaytonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  2. Peaseley v. VIRGINIA IRON, COAL AND COKE COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  3. Moon v. PhippsWashington Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Lawing v. JaynesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  5. First-Citizens Bank & Trust Co. v. FrazelleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cater v. BarkerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  2. Poore v. Swan Quarter Farms, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  3. Cater v. BarkerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API