LDDC, INC. v. Pressley
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
VAUGHN, Chief Judge.
We hold that the trial court was correct in concluding that Hubert Pressley, as tenant in common with Alaska Pressley, could not convey an easement for a right-of-way to petitioner which would bind Alaska Pressley, where she did not join in the conveyance. We therefore affirm.
A tenancy in common is characterized by a single essential unity, that of possession, or the right to possession of the common property. Lockleair v. Martin, 245 N.C. 378, 381, 96 S.E. 2d 24, 26 (1957). Each tenant owns a separate undivided interest in the land in his or her own right, and each has an…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Blades v. City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company v. RobertsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- Shingleton v. StateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- Bellefonte Underwriters Insurance v. Alfa Aviation, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
- Browning v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Keller v. HartmanWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1985
- Mooring Capital Fund, LLC v. Comstock N.C., LLCNorth Carolina Business Court · 2009
- AUSTIN HATCHER REALTY, INC. v. ArnoldCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
- Fifth Ave. United Methodist Church of Wilmington v. The N.C. Conf.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2024