DEPARTMENT OF INDUS. REL. v. Fidelity Roof Co.
California Court of Appeal
[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CORRIGAN, J.
In this case arising from a violation of the state’s prevailing wage law (Lab. Code, § 1720 et seq.), 1 we conclude the complaint against Fidelity Roof Company (Fidelity) was not timely filed. We further hold that the Department of Industrial Relations, Division of Labor Standards Enforcement (DLSE) may collect unpaid wages from the payment bond surety under the circumstances presented here.
Statement of the Case
On April 4, 1991, Fidelity contracted with the Alameda Unified School District (AUSD) to reroof Encinal High School. On December 10, AUSD passed a resolution…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Aubry v. Tri-City Hospital DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- People v. TannerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Lusardi Construction Co. v. AubryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Pneucrete Corp. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1935
- Powers Regulator Co. v. Seaboard Surety Co. of New YorkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Amaral v. Cintas Corp. No. 2California Court of Appeal · 2008
- Noble v. DraperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Road Sprinkler Fitters Local Union No. 669 v. G & G Fire Sprinklers, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2002
- Molenda v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority v. ReaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.