Legal Opinion

Dastagir v. Dastagir

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 19, 1952No. Civ. 18501PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HANSON, J. pro tem.

This is a paternity suit instituted by the mother on behalf of her infant daughter to have it adjudged that the defendant was the father and under a duty to support the child. The jury returned a nine-to-three verdict in favor of the defendant.

The basic question presented to us on the record is whether the plaintiff did or did not have a fair trial.

In view of the serious contentions made by plaintiff, as appellant, it should here be stated that neither counsel for the appellant nor for the respondent was retained or participated in any of the proceedings had in the court…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. People v. DurrantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Berry v. ChaplinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  3. People v. WellsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Scripps v. ReillyMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
  5. Buel v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. People v. PerezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Gherman v. ColburnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  3. Hoel v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  4. Huntingdon v. CrowleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Fults v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API