Legal Opinion

Cleland v. Wilcox

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 26, 1975PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBryson, J.

This is an action to recover damages for injuries incurred in an automobile accident. The trial court allowed defendant’s motion for involuntary nonsuit. Plaintiff appeals.

The' sole assignment of error is that “[t]he trial court erred in ruling that expert medical evidence was required to make out a case of causal relationship between plaintiff’s injuries and the accident.”

We review the evidence in a light most favorable to plaintiff, including all favorable inferences that may be drawn from the evidence.

On November 23, 1972, plaintiff was driving north on Interstate 5 near Albany, Oregon.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Uris v. State Compensation DepartmentOregon Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Feist v. Sears, Roebuck & CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Howerton v. PfaffOregon Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Larson v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Sims v. DixonOregon Supreme Court · 1960

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Joshi v. Providence Health System of Oregon Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Chouinard v. Health VenturesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  3. Joshi v. Providence Health System of Oregon Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  4. Westfall v. Rust International & Underwriters Adjusting Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Wheeler v. LaVioletteCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API